亚马逊

From chips to sunflower seeds and dumplings, Washington's sanctions tear away its own fig-leaf_我的网站

A |     Sophie 编译 去年年底，即使新政府已经上台，并承诺减少人员编制，但核心政府部门仍在大量招聘。    By Wang Gaofei, Wu Xinru     (ECNS) -- Do sunflower seeds and dumplings pose a "threat" to U.S. national security?    The question may sound absurd, but the latest additions to the so-called Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) entity list have raised questions about the breadth of the U.S. trade restrictions on Chinese goods. 43 Chinese companies have been added to the list in a single day, bringing the total to 187. From advanced chips to food and everyday apparel, the overreaching "big stick" of U.S. sanctions has finally ripped away its own fig-leaf.    Is this move really driven by "human rights concerns" as the West claimed, or is it merely the result of political calculation by Washington's elites? What lies behind Washington's decision to escalate sanctions just one day after reaching a consensus?    Josef Gregory Mahoney, an American scholar and professor of Politics and International Relations at East China Normal University, was recently invited to join News Lounge of China News Network where he unpacked the real intentions of U.S. sanctions.        Sunflower seeds and dumplings land on the list: The absurdity and futility behind overreaching sanctions     "This move is logically indefensible," Mahoney stated bluntly, "These consumer goods firms have absolutely no connection to the so-called 'forced labor' allegations. Claims are entirely fabricated and lack any factual basis."     He argued that the U.S.' true intention is clear -- using groundless excuses to suppress China's competitive ordinary industries, disrupt the stability of China's industrial and supply chains, and protect the market share of its own traditional industries at the expense of Chinese enterprises' legitimate rights.         When even sunflower seeds and dumplings are labeled as "threats," the veteran scholar of China-U.S. relations emphasized, it exposes the absurdity and desperation behind Washington's containment strategy.     Turning to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) itself, he was even more incisive: "In the context of international law, the UFLPA has no legitimate legal foundation. In fact, it violates basic WTO rules and international trade norms."    He also added that the enforcement criteria of UFLPA are fatally flawed, adopting an unfair, rebuttable presumption that treats all related entities as guilty without evidence. When the law arbitrarily expands restrictions without clear, consistent judgment, it reverses the fundamental legal principle of presumption of innocence.     To suppress China, Washington has disregarded legal principles and fallen into logical contradictions, going to extraordinary lengths to achieve its ends.    Mahoney stressed: "It is blatant economic coercion, which could bring far-reaching harm," including erecting unnecessary trade barriers, hindering the flow of bilateral goods, and disrupting global industrial chain arrangements. Washington will hardly be able to bear the bitter fruits of these spillover effects.    Backtracking the very next day: Political calculation trumps economic and trade consensus     Just one day before the sanctions were announced, senior Chinese and U.S. officials in charge of economic and trade affairs had just held a video call, during which both sides stated that they were ready to jointly push for stable and sound China-U.S. economic and trade ties. Yet Washington brandished the big stick of sanctions almost immediately after those remarks. According to Mahoney, the timing is a deliberate and calculated provocation.     "The U.S. uses engagement and escalation as two sides of the same policy. It aims to create unilateral leverage before the follow-up consultations, break the mutual trust just built and force China into unnecessary concessions, completely violating the consensus reached by both parties."    The so-called "human rights concerns" appear to be a plausible pretext by the U.S. Yet in Mahoney's eyes, the sanction escalation stems almost entirely from domestic U.S. political calculation.     As the midterm elections draw near, demonstrating toughness on China remains one of the few tactics to unite Washington's bitterly-divided political establishment. The U.S. Congress has consistently demanded more aggressive UFLPA enforcement, and expanding the entity list helps insulate the White House from criticism by China Hawks.    Mahoney sees through this ploy: "It says nothing more than a convenient political fig leaf."    But just how much of Washington's shame can this fig leaf possibly cover?        Mahoney pointed directly to long-unresolved domestic issues in the United States, including sweatshop labor, prison labor and the abuse of migrant labor. Abroad, Washington has resorted to the aggression against Venezuela, against Iran, and supporting the genocide in Gaza.     Plagued by deep-seated domestic ills and a dismal human rights record, Washington, though, has long posed as a self-appointed "world's policeman," but its actions only serve to expose its deep hypocrisy.    Mahoney warned that, faced with election-driven pressures, continued festering of domestic governance problems in the U.S. could push Washington toward increasingly radical foreign policy stances. This sanction move, which represents a betrayal of previous consensus, has further eroded the already fragile China-U.S. mutual trust and introduced considerable uncertainties for subsequent high-level consultations.      Truth long obscured: Heavy barriers hide the reality     Western public discourse has long been awash with various false narratives targeting China, Xinjiang in particular.    "One of the interesting things we know about the cotton industry in Xinjiang is that there's no 'forced labor,' period. One of the things that is sort of interesting is that anyone can go to Xinjiang. It welcomes all visitors." Mahoney iterated in the interview.    During his recent visit to Xinjiang, Mahoney not only witnessed firsthand the highly-mechanized cotton-harvesting operations, but also toured local factories that produce harvesting equipment.    Inside the production workshops, he saw working teams led by female engineers, and members included Uyghurs who were there as professionals. Everyone performed their respective duties, actively contributing ideas and energy to production with great enthusiasm. Nowhere did he see "forced labor" or "slave labor" decried in Western media narratives.     Only by experiencing it firsthand and verifying through on-the-ground investigation can one get a glimpse of the truth. Mahoney noted that foreign visitors traveling to Urumqi, Karamay, and Kashgar are consistently struck by the region's stability, public order, and the well-being of its people.    Not everyone can afford, unfortunately, to travel to China, as Mahoney introduced, especially many Americans who find their position eroding economically because of the very policies that the current administration is putting into place. "They're kind of trapped in economic decline."    Some anti-China forces have long engaged in blame-shifting, seeking to externalize domestic governance conflicts and divert public discontent through media narratives. Trapped within pre-set information echo chambers, ordinary citizens lack the means to verify the truth by traveling to China. Exposed over time to one-sided, misleading and even false reports, they readily develop deep-seated negative stereotypes about China.    Encouragingly, the current media landscape is quietly shifting.    Mahoney noticed that a level of criticality has sort of entered the discussion now, which is creating an opening for people to take a more balanced look at China.    In recent years, China has rolled out multiple visa-exemption policies, and the popularity of travelling to China continues to surge. In his view, this offers an excellent opportunity for people overseas to break free from false narratives and see a multifaceted, authentic China. At the end of the interview, Mahoney shared his observations on the future development of China-U.S. relations.     In his view, how relations unfold between these two major powers has implications well beyond the two nations but also the global order.     Mahoney explained how Europe, faced with persistently high risks of deindustrialization, is further impacted by the energy crisis amid regional conflicts stoked by the United States, such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the Iran-Israel conflict. A large volume of opportunities and investment therefore has flowed outward, forcing Europe to adopt trade-protectionist stances toward China, which brings complications to China's relationship with the EU. Mahoney said that a growing number of countries are seeing these developments. And they realize that if they want to avoid the boot heel of American hegemony, they have to find more constructive alternatives and the ability to advance according to their own agendas. "And these, in fact, are the alternatives that China is offering them."    He held that some significant headwinds would be raised for the short-term development of China-U.S. relations and they would become more complicated.     His position is that the United States is facing a relative decline and is being hollowed out from within by itself while still being engaged in imperial overreach globally. Increasingly, the world is building alternatives to that type of U.S. dominated model.     On the contrary, China is probably the country best-positioned in the world to weather those types of risks and to even moderate them to some extent. He believes the country will work through this.    "China has been a responsible major power that has committed itself to stability over conflict," said Mahoney.    "If the U.S. can wake up to that realization, while at the same time figure out a way to change its behavior and commitment to structural inequalities, then I think we might find the two countries being able to move together in a way that would better result in a shared future for humanity," he concluded.                    。与此形成对比的是，公共服务委员会（PSC）发布的最新数据显示，各机构已经开始削减在外部顾问和承包商上的支出。         尽管新政府广泛宣传了削减成本的意图，但也许正是因为如此，在截至12月31日的六个月内，整个公共服务部门的全职等效岗位（FTE）增加了4.1%，达到了65699个的历史最高水平。

B |          Advertise with us          中央政府38个公共服务部门和机构中，7个缩减了规模，31个扩大了规模，共增加了2580名FTE职员。         在过去五年里，公共服务人员增加了32%。         相比之下，这些中央政府机构在承包商和顾问方面的支出在6个月期间降至5.262亿纽币，其中3.446亿纽币用于运营支出，1.816亿纽币用于资本支出，降幅相当可观。

C |          公共服务部门的顾问和承包商账单在2022/2023财年为12.68亿纽币，2021/2022财年为12.43亿纽币。         这些数据表明，各机构对上届政府迟来的削减公共服务支出的努力做出了回应——从2023年中期开始——削减外部承包商和顾问开支，但同时还在继续招聘扩大自己的队伍。         PSC的一位发言人表示，到2023年下半年，员工的增加是基于上届政府的工作计划和优先事项：“随着政府节约和加强效率以及2024年预算决策的逐渐落实，预计人数将下降。”          国家党领导的新联合政府承诺将年度公共服务支出削减6.5%至7.5%，具体细节由公共服务部门的高层决定，财政部长兼公共服务部长Nicola Willis说。         Willis表示，政府机构应该把节支重点放在低价值项目、后勤工作、顾问和承包商上。         她告诉英文《先驱报》，新的招聘数据反映了上届政府对公共f'w支出的懈怠态度：“没有很多证据表明公共服务部门认真对待了上届政府的节支工作，但它们已经获悉了本届政府的要求。人数正在下降，我们预计他们会继续这样做。”                    各公共服务部门的情况          在去年后半年里，招聘增加最多的三个机构是：社会发展部（FTE增加405个，增长4.5%）；商业、创新和就业部（FTE增加365个，增长5.9%）；以及税务局（FTE增加363个，增长9%）。         以百分比计算，环境部的员工增幅最大，在六个月期间FTE增加了182个，增幅为22%。

D |          在上一个完整财政年度（2022/2023），公共服务部门的总基本工资成本增加了11.8%（6.48亿纽币），至61亿纽币，原因是总人数增加和平均工资上涨了7%。         PSC还没有更新截至12月31日的六个月的成本数据。         在2011/22财政年度，卫生部在承包商和顾问上花费了1.54亿纽币。与新冠疫情相关的支出无疑是影响支出水平的一个因素，其中许多措施已经结束。但与新冠相关的支出减少不太可能是所有下降的原因。

E |          在2022/2023财政年度，该部门在外部援助上的支出大幅减少，降至4700万纽币，而在截至12月的六个月里，仅支出了1270万纽币。在过去的18个月里，该部门的内部员工人数也减少了7%。         其中大部分支出和一些部门员工转移到了新西兰卫生局和毛利卫生管理局（即将解散），这两个机构都是在2022年7月1日成立的。

F | 具体支出数额尚不清楚。         这两个新机构都不属于公共服务部门。自正式成立以来，在顾问和承包商方面的支出可能达到数亿纽币。2022/2023财年的数据将很快通过国会的年度审查程序公布。         在承包商和顾问的支出方面，教育部继续处于领先地位。在截至去年12月的六个月里，该部门共支出了1.31亿纽币，其中超过三分之二的资金被认为是运营支出，其余的则与学校建筑等资本支出有关。         内政部（负责现已废除的三水计划）似乎对外部开支做出了最具意义的削减：其外部开支在2022/2023财政年度达到1.22亿纽币，在最近的六个月中降至4400万纽币。

G |                    公共服务部门负责人的薪酬          PSC还更新了其机构负责人的薪酬数据。         PSC发言人表示，在截至2023年12月的六个月里，公共服务部门首席执行官的平均薪酬增长了1.2%，至49.5万纽币。         他说：“这一增长是合理的，因为在2022/23年度，政府实体首席执行官的薪酬增长了2.2%，而同期私营部门首席执行官的薪酬增长了3.5%。”          他指出，从2020年到2022年底，由于薪酬限制，公共服务部门的首席执行官在三年内没有加薪。         “我们现在开始看到一些增长，这是合理的。过去5年（自2018年以来）的净增长是4.4%。”          2023年加薪幅度最大的是环保部总干事Penny Nelson。

H | 包括Nelson在内的许多公共服务部门负责人的薪酬是按日历年计算的。2023年，Nelson的薪酬为49.5万纽币，比前一年增长了13.5%。         PSC发言人表示，这一增长是由于最近对该职位的“重新调整”，以及2023年1月的薪酬审查导致的。         相关阅读：          为完成节支目标，政府这一部门将裁员384人          政府今年将节省开支大举减税，有多少公务员会被裁？          政府开始削减经费，这个部门率先裁撤40个职位          在国家党政府上台之前，知道会裁公务员，很多合同工已转为永久员工……          如果国家党上台，这一政府部门开支可能会被削减30%          机构越来越臃肿？工党执政下，这些部门的公关人员增加了50%          注：本文为编译/原创，欢迎转发分享；但严禁复制等未经授权的非法使用。违反上述声明者，本网将追究其相关法律责任。使用授权请联系[email protected]。         chineseherald.co.nz All Rights Reserved 版权所有          (责编：Sophie)          相关内容                亚裔律师神操作：给客户立遗嘱，受益人写自己，客户全家“净身出户”……           员工润去了黄金海岸，奥克兰市议会允许其远程工作           住豪宅、开法拉利，奥克兰华人毒枭承认是贩毒集团头目           奥克兰北岸绑架案：一男一女在酒吧被捕，绑架动机是......           彩虹活动被取消、人行道被破坏，新西兰仇恨犯罪又回来了？           可怕！北岸发生绑架案！还有人开枪！           疫情通报：过去一周新西兰新增3399例           总理公布未来三个月的“行动计划”，重点关注三个领域。

Current article:http://hgd.ruidunguizanpaorangchongouxia.sbs/list_lyav/h9x4d.html

Published on:00:00:00